So what's the reason behind painting only white subjects? Do you not want to be pigeon holed or do you just only have particular people to paint? The public wants to know :)

That is the question I always want to answer! I think for me the reason I do it is because I am interested in analyzing canonized cultural ideals in western society, but short circuiting the normal expected manner for an artist of color to address these issues. I am interested in how the work I have is perceived to be about one set of issues when someone doesn’t know I made them, and how that read is changed once they do know a black person painted these images. I like to poke at the gap that is between these two receptions of the work, to and expose WHY there is a difference between them in the first place.

I think there are many black artists who have done great things in terms of representation of black images, as well as pushing forward conceptually the territory of the black image. I however feel that the work I do is the most productive way I can think of to make strides conceptually in this territory, while not being a part of some pre-established and pre-ordained way of approaching issues of class and race in painting. 

I am wanting to show society its own ideals, and present a laser-like focus so that people see these values for the strangeness they posses. That these values aren’t normal or universal, but particular just as any “others” are. That society reinforces certain normative attitudes, and by just presenting them, I am exposing the fact that they are constructed, and perpetuated, but not innate.

It is a conscious choice, not a lack of options, and its definitely not to just avoid being pigeon holed; although that may have some partial influence. It’s to have a conversation about these ideas in a way never fully considered. It’s about who controls what, and how cultural standards are reinforced by all of us everyday, even when we might personally disagree with them.

Brandon Dean
“Bastian” 48X72” Oil on Canvas, 2012
One of my recent paintings.
artnamnesis:

by Mario Testino

I have been to this small museum dedicated to Hendrik Christian Andersen. It was literally one block away from the Temple University Rome building. He was a wierd artist, gay, and his lover (a fellow artist) left him after many years over hating his work. Its wierd utopian sculpture for a culture that doesn’t exist. Its part kitsch, part fascist, part erotic, but all bizarre. I walked through this place at least twice a week.

There is nothing more annoying than an amazing artist who only uses a FLICKR…

…or worse, only has a deviantart account. 

Join the rest of the self respecting artist population and get a portfolio site.

When I see a decent artist website, I look at the work and think “Yes, I could see this in a respectable gallery.”

When I see an artist only using Flickr or Deviant Art, I think “I wonder do they sell paintings at the county fair?”

Your best foot forward online shouldnt be wearing a Croc, get a website!

[Flash 10 is required to watch video]